LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for NVBIRDS Archives


NVBIRDS Archives

NVBIRDS Archives


NVBIRDS@LIST.AUDUBON.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NVBIRDS Home

NVBIRDS Home

NVBIRDS  February 2014

NVBIRDS February 2014

Subject:

Fwd: Cook Inlet vs. Slaty-backed: a summary

From:

Tristan McKee <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tristan McKee <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 9 Feb 2014 02:45:48 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Tristan McKee <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: February 9, 2014 at 2:42:52 AM PST
> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Cook Inlet vs. Slaty-backed: a summary
> 
> Hi Calbirders,
> 
> Regardless of its identification, the juvenile gull frequenting downtown Arcata this winter provides an unparalleled opportunity to ponder Slaty-backed characters up close, in direct comparison with Glaucous-winged and Herring gulls and their apparent hybrids. These hybrids are the source of the popular notion that first-cycle Slaty-backed Gulls simply cannot be identified here, in the absence of incoming slaty mantle feathers. However, the Arcata bird shows numerous traits that differ from both species and are not intermediate between them. I have also just uploaded a zoomed-in photo that shows an incoming bluish-slate-colored mantle feather (I am unsure if this is diagnostic, so I'm not placing much weight on it at this point):
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12394547043/
> 
> Since development of identification criteria for this cycle has largely occurred on the internet and is widely scattered, I have summarized the results of my work this winter to distinguish Slaty-backed from "Cook Inlet" hybrids. A more detailed account will be published shortly, but I figured hey, it's February, and there is still time to put some of this into practice before the end of gull season.
> 
> Two of the most helpful references for Slaty-backed ID are Moores (2005) and Zimmer (2000):
> 
> http://www.birdskorea.org/Birds/Identification/ID_Notes/BK-ID-Slaty-backed-Gull.shtml
> 
> http://books.google.com/books?id=TMtB8CG767EC&pg=PA163&dq=Slaty-backed+Gull&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ywD3UqyYDoneoAS_3IHwBQ&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA
> 
> Probably the best way to familiarize yourself with this extremely variable bird, without going to Asia, is to spend some time on the Japanese Gull-Site:
> 
> http://www23.tok2.com/home/jgull/gullidentifi_.htm
> 
> Also be sure to read Chris Gibbins' excellent blog on this topic:
> 
> http://chrisgibbins-gullsbirds.blogspot.com/2010/02/first-winter-slaty-backed-gull-bit-of.html?m=1
> 
> I highly recommend exploring the behavioral ecology work of Yutaka Watanuki on this species, which gives a bit of context for the phenotypic plasticity that has been at the root of our confusion as birders.
> 
> Identifying birds in this cycle is not unlike identifying Accipiters. There are few cut-and-dried field marks, but with a little practice, we can learn to apply a whole suite of structural and plumage characters that make the identification of most individuals relatively clear. Admittedly, rampant hybridization forces us to let a higher percentage of gulls go, but that does not mean we should shy away from those birds displaying ten or twenty traits that add up to a reasonable conclusion.
> 
> First, I should mention that the Arcata bird lacks deep pink legs. This is not uncommon on first-cycle Slaty-backed Gulls in Asia (see the Japanese Gull-Site).
> 
> The following are 14 key traits of Slaty-backed (in no particular order) that differ from the Glaucous-winged/Herring continuum. Note that Slaty-backed is tremendously variable, and we should not expect all (any?) birds to have ALL the "classic Slaty-backed" traits. I have added links to photos of the Arcata bird that illustrate these concepts.
> 
> 1) Short wings. This is often used by the Japanese experts.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12314683794/
> 
> Note that this species also seems to have exceptionally flexible wings. The humerus is often extended significantly. In combination with folding the secondaries inward, this can give the wings an unexpectedly long, narrow look:
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12267289063/
> 
> 2) The primary panel looks short and narrow, both on the sitting bird and in flight (except, of course, when the hand is fully spread). I have discussed this in a little more detail in the captions of these three photos:
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12314407293/
> 
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/101791769@N08/12314260615/
> 
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/101791769@N08/12272532173/
> 
> 3) Short, stout bill with minimal gonydeal angle and slightly drooping appearance:
> 
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/101791769@N08/12314409633/
> 
> 4) Contrasting dark mask through the eye and onto the auriculars. Herring tends to be plainer on the face, while Glaucous-winged can have a dark smudge through the eye and onto the cap, and, sometimes, onto the auriculars. In the "classic Slaty-backed look", this dark mask is set off by a whitish half-collar on the side of the neck and a whitish area around the bill, as well as the rather bold eye crescents.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12295002084/
> 
> 5) Plain-based greater coverts (dark brown when fresh, white later). This and all similar species have variable greater covert patterning, however.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12294718133/
> 
> 6) Distinctly decurved gape, which is shared with California but generally not with Glaucous-winged or Herring. I have seen Glaucous-winged Gulls that approached this look, however.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12402310734/in/photostream/
> 
> 7) Long mid-secondaries. These look like a point or bulge when spread, much like a skua. This is not obvious when they are more folded.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12255374275/
> 
> 8) Contrastingly white background to rump. Many Slaty-backed Gulls have uncontrasting darker rumps, especially in fresh plumage. A contrastingly white background, however, is also common and differs from the darker rumps of both Glaucous-winged and American Herring gulls.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12279690664/
> 
> 9) Many birds have a rather blocky-looking head shape, with a concave slope to the forehead. Glaucous-winged tends to have a more evenly rounded forehead (convex), while Herring has a rather flat-looking forehead. Conceivably, a hybrid might combine these two looks into something like Slaty-backed.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12402147224/
> 
> 10) On many birds, the inner primaries are darker than either Glaucous-winged or Herring. The "shadow string of pearls" effect can be quite striking.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12402310734/
> 
> 11) When resting and often while walking, Slaty-backed exhibits a very forward-hunched, pot-bellied, chest-heavy posture.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12255795685/
> 
> 12) The legs of Slaty-backed vary from pale fleshy pink to dark, vivid pink. The latter is fairly distinctive, but note that low light angles can make any gull's feet look quite vivid.
> 
> 13) The legs vary greatly in length but are often notably widely-spaced, and the gait has been described as waddling or goose-like. A particularly thick-legged look is also characteristic but not always evident.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12267708256/
> 
> 14) When alert, the neck looks very long. Other gulls can certainly approximate this look, however.
> 
> http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/101791769@N08/12279614836/
> 
> It is important to note that not all of these differences would apply to a Vega x Glaucous-winged hybrid. Therefore, it is crucial to confirm that dark brown extends to the base of the tail (though occasional apparent Slaty-backeds do have white mottling across the entire tail base; such a bird would likely be much more difficult to establish as a vagrant).
> 
> 
> Investigation of this formerly very popular identification problem seems to have dropped off drastically since I was a kid. This seems to stem from frustration with all the appearances presented by the prevalent hybrids in this state. Nonetheless, working out these issues has very much been a community effort, and I hope that continues; I would love to hear more discussion and debate on this matter. I'd particularly like to thank Zachary Ormsby, John Sterling, Ken Burton, Alvaro Jaramillo, Steve Hampton, Peter Pyle, Jude Claire Power, David Fix, Osao and Michiaki Ujihara, Rob Fowler, Amar Ayyash, Paul Lehman, Steve Howell, Martin Meyers, and Steve Rottenborn for joining me in grappling with this problem over the course of the winter.
> 
> Go find some county first Slaty-backed Gulls!
> 
> Tristan McKee
> Arcata, CA

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.AUDUBON.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager